<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Texture (Art)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nextvista.org/texture-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nextvista.org/texture-art/</link>
	<description>at NextVista.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:37:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.nextvista.org/texture-art/comment-page-1/#comment-19142</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 02:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nextvista.org/2007/08/20/texture-art/#comment-19142</guid>
		<description>Good explicit comments. Used familiar examples. Everyone recognizes a soft kitty. I liked the tree bark. A good demonstration. Easy to recognize the contrast of the actual bumpy feel of the bark and the simulated texture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good explicit comments. Used familiar examples. Everyone recognizes a soft kitty. I liked the tree bark. A good demonstration. Easy to recognize the contrast of the actual bumpy feel of the bark and the simulated texture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

